Un Coin du Salon en 1880
by Edouard Datan (1848 - 1897)
Firstly, this museum puts on stunning exhibitions, real benchmarks in what is considered good European and Japanese western painting, gosh some of the imagery one has seen on exhibit here, along with the quality and quantity has been breathtaking. So when museums do that, then the expectations are high, for having the likes of Van Gogh Cézanne and Rubens etc..., on show to name a few, really sets a precedent.
This current exhibition is ordinary by comparison, not so much because the art by the Japanese artists within the Kansai region is bad, it’s not, in the many years in reviewing local galleries here they can hold their head comfortably, and exhibit anywhere world-wide but this show tends to be an average spectacle of its representation.
One of the reasons for this ordinary exhibition may well be one of the curator's criteria for selection of artists as stated here;
A certain amount of attention would be paid to the ratio of men and women. This was due to the fact that as a male curator I was worried that I might unconsciously choose too many men. Ultimately I settled on an equal number: fourteen men and fourteen women.
The curator need not have worried about gender equality, had he picked really good aesthetic paintings that could have happened to represent twenty women and eight men, no one may well have cared because the art would have revealed that the instinct of the curator was at its best. Equity may well have been an issue for the curator but this is a major art gallery, one believes the people want the best art on show from that region and this show is a very good idea, for it lets the Kansai audience see the quality and quantity of artists available to them, in fact the exhibition could have easily included another twenty five artists from the area.
The aesthetic choices due to this equity issue tends to let the exhibition down because some of women/men chosen are not as good as the other artists. For example, some of the painted and drawn qualities that appear within the artworks by Osawa Sakae, Ikeda Mitsuhiro, Kato Mika, Kurita Sakiko, Hoki Nobuya, Kobayashi Takanbou and Nara Yoshitmoto are really sophisticated, revealing that these artists have a very good sensibility in art others on exhibit do not resonate that savvy in image making.
As stated before this is a good gallery and when such aesthetic benchmarks are set then they need to be maintained and not interfered with by some kind of idea of fairness or in the interest of public safety. For one doesn’t want to feel safe but in awe and shock of recent contemporary Japanese painting, the boundaries need to be stretched to the limit, not contracted in some way or another by the mission creep of equity. Good painted aesthetics doesn’t operate on equity,that's a construction of some kind of idea from societal memory and perfect equity tends not exist.
But nonetheless if you’re in Osaka this is an interesting show well worth a visit.
But nonetheless if you’re in Osaka this is an interesting show well worth a visit.
